[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”arp1″]
Please assign this to my prefer writer id 286370. This is a two part assignment. The first part is to answer the two questions listed below and second part is to review four peers paper and follow the response guidelines. Please answer and label the questions accordingly. This is a critical thinking, graduate level essay.
Part I: These are two separate questions therefore please do not combine the two questions together. For example: Q1, Q2, with in-text citation from course reading material listed below as references. 1. Two additional references are required. 2. In-text citation on every paragraph. 3. Please label all subheading. 4. APA formatting and style. My professor reviews my paper and will provide feedback and he usually requires for addition clarification in regards to what have been written. Therefore, I will forward to you the question(s) from my professor. Please answer the question(s) accordingly. Per class requirement, all papers must be submitted to Smarthinking for review before I can submit it in therefore please revise the paper according to Smarthinking suggestion.
Part II: Response Guidelines- please follow direction for response guidelines. In-text citation.
Text Book- (in-text citation) Ford, G. G. (2006). Ethical reasoning for mental health professionals. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. ISBN: 9780761930945.
Paper should be broken into two segments:
1) RESEARCH SUMMARY. In the first segment of your post, objectively summarize your research article(s). It should take your classmates through the major ideas, research strategies, disposition, and conclusions (if any) presented in the text(s). In text citation is required for every paragraph.
2) CRITICAL RESPONSE. Once you’ve summarized your research, reflect on what you’ve read and write a short critical response detailing what this research means to you. Is it consistent with your personal and professional experience? Does it help you understand or explain patterns of thought and behavior that you’ve seen or experienced? Has it changed or challenged your thoughts on its subject, and if so, how? Is it inconsistent with your world, your experiences, or the experiences of those around you? Were there holes or inconsistencies in the logic of the research? And so on. Feel free to push back against some of these theories and concepts. Test and them against your own experiences, personal and professional. Challenge them with your own insights, philosophies, and knowledge. Feel free to be bold and take chances. Remember that this is a discussion, so it’s an ideal place for you to audition ideas, whether developed or undeveloped, and get feedback from a supportive audience. I also advise that, when possible, you find concrete examples (real or hypothetical) to help you illuminate/animate your ideas
Readings:
Select one or more of the special contexts (psychotherapy and counseling, assessment and testing, teaching and supervision, and/or research) in which you are interested, and read the materials that go with the context or contexts you have selected.
• Research at Capella – Ethical Foundations.
• Research at Capella – Research Integrity.
• Research at Capella – IRB Review.
• Key Events in Ethical Research.
• Ethical Considerations in Research.
Discuss the philosophical basis of ethical reasoning models and evaluate the effectiveness of each model presented in this unit’s readings (utilitarianism, formalism, relativism, and contextualism) in resolving ethical dilemmas and conflicts.
[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”arp2″]
A-Research-Paper.com is committed to deliver a custom paper/essay which is 100% original and deliver it within the deadline. Place your custom order with us and experience the different; You are guaranteed; value for your money and a premium paper which meets your expectations, 24/7 customer support and communication with your writer. Order Now
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]