[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”arp1″]
In this assignment, you will practice making ethical decisions.
• Select one “Practice Case Involving the Model of Ethical Decision Making” from the following pages of Ethical Reasoning for Mental Health Professionals: pages 127–128 (Ch. 6), page 170 (Ch. 8), page 219 (Ch. 11), or pages 249–250 (Ch. 12).
• Select one of the models of ethical decision making presented in this course. Apply each of the steps of that ethical decision-making model, and evaluate the value of this process in addressing the ethical dilemma in the practice case.
• Apply relevant professional ethical codes, principles, and standards, and evaluate the strengths and limitations of the codes, principles, or standards.
• Apply two or more comprehensive models of ethical reasoning (such as utilitarianism, Kant’s formalist theory, ethical relativism, or Wallace’s ethical contextualism) to think through this case, and evaluate the strengths and limitations of the models.
• Incorporate relevant scholarly sources to support your analysis.
• Apply APA style for your in-text citations, references, and overall paper formatting (title page, running header, spacing, justification, abstract, introduction, conclusion et cetera).
• In-text citation for every paragraph
• At least four references
• Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the psychological professions.
Your case study should be four to five pages (double-spaced), excluding the title page, abstract, and references.
Criteria for the paper:
Apply an ethical decision-making process- Applies each of the steps of an ethical decision-making process and evaluates the value of this process in addressing the ethical dilemma.
Apply relevant professional ethical codes, principles, and standards- Applies relevant professional ethical codes, principles, and standards and evaluates the strengths and limitations of them.
Apply comprehensive models of ethical reasoning (such as utilitarianism, Kant’s formalist theory, ethical relativism, or Wallace’s ethical contextualism) – Applies two or more comprehensive models of ethical reasoning to think through the case and evaluates the strengths and limitations of the models.
Incorporate relevant scholarly sources to support the analysis – Incorporates many excellent scholarly sources to support the analysis.
[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”arp2″]
A-Research-Paper.com is committed to deliver a custom paper/essay which is 100% original and deliver it within the deadline. Place your custom order with us and experience the different; You are guaranteed; value for your money and a premium paper which meets your expectations, 24/7 customer support and communication with your writer. Order Now
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]
