Assessing Your Strengths and WeaknessesCustom Essay

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”arp1″]

You have taken a self-assessment of your understanding of research design, research methods, and the dissertation process.

Use APA and include 5 references and prepare a 1 page essay responding to the two below question regarding the following:

What did the assessment tell you about your understanding and familiarity with research methods, research designs, and the Walden dissertation process? What are your key related strengths and weaknesses?

What are your plans to enhance your strengths and improve on your weaknesses during this course and beyond?

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”arp2″]

A-Research-Paper.com is committed to deliver a custom paper/essay which is 100% original and deliver it within the deadline. Place your custom order with us and experience the different; You are guaranteed; value for your money and a premium paper which meets your expectations, 24/7 customer support and communication with your writer. Order Now

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Business and Government Relations Custom Essay

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”arp1″]

ANALYTICAL PAPER REQUIREMENT FOR BADM

1. Analyze a Federal agency’s proposal for a new or revised rule published in the Federal Register. Be sure the agency is asking for public comment, and be sure the proposal presents some substantive issues you can discuss. If the proposal is more than one year old, you must obtain approval for the topic.

Your task is to prepare a paper to let me decide whether I want to adopt the rule, change it, or reject it. You want to demonstrate your analytical prowess; you are likely to find that difficult if your topic is how an agency should change its procedural rules, for example. On the other hand, some seemingly minor rules (e.g., size standards for cucumbers) may raise significant policy issues. Consult with me if you have any doubts.

2. Due December 10. It should be about 15 pages if you work alone, 20 pages if you work in a group, double spaced, typed, with pages numbered.

You may work on the paper as a group project, provided that:
a. The group is small (no more than 3), and I have specifically approved it.
b. I have approved the topic. You can give me a note or email me with your group and topic for approval.
c. I expect a more substantial effort from a group paper than from an individual effort. In particular, I expect a more comprehensive research effort.
3. Your paper should be thorough, well reasoned, well organized, and well supported. It should accomplish the following tasks, although it will probably be best to organize the paper around the issues is raises, rather than the tasks listed below.

a. Describe briefly the agency’s proposal. What exactly are they going to require? Be sure to include a specific citation to the proposal.

b. Analyze the problem the agency is trying to solve. What market failure creates a need for intervention? How big is the problem? What causes it? Is it really a problem at all, or should it be left alone?

c. Summarize the major comments on the proposal. Comments are available, virtually always online, but precisely where is likely to depend on the agency. Comments submitted through the official portal for rules (www.regulations.gov) are available through that site, but my experience is that many agencies have an easier-to-use collection of the comments on their own websites. You’ll have to poke around to find it. You don’t need to read or summarize all of the individual comments, but you do need to describe what the significant interest groups have to say about the proposal. Your summary should be built around the pros and cons of the proposal from the perspective of the different interest groups. You don’t need to organize the summary group by group, (it may read better if it is organized around issues, rather than groups) but you should include the position of each of the major groups.

d. Look for relatively disinterested analyses of the issue to help understand what the agency is proposing and the likely effects of the rule. Academic articles addressing the specific rule you are considering will be rare, but articles addressing the general issues and analyzing alternative approaches are common, and will be extremely valuable. “Think tanks,” such as the American Enterprise Institute, the Brookings Institution, the Cato Institute, or the Center for American Progress often have their own analyses of regulatory issues. Also useful is the Mercatus Center, which files comments on many rules from a “public interest” perspective. You’ll need to check their websites; think tanks don’t often file comments on regulatory proposals (although, like Mercatus, they may). Think tanks have a political point of view, but it is not usually a self-interested perspective. I expect a well researched, well supported argument, with appropriate citations for facts, quotations, and opinions of others.

e. Make a recommendation. Should I adopt this rule, change it, or reject it? How is your recommendation consistent with the public interest in the sense that economists use the term (maximizing consumer welfare as judged by consumers)?

4. There are several ways to find a paper topic. You want a rule where the comment period will have ended before the paper is due, because otherwise there won’t be many comments filed (the major commenters use all the time available to polish their comment and tend to file on the last day).
a. You can do keyword searches on the rules at regulations.gov. This is probably the best way.
b. You can consult The Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions, available online at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/ua/index.html. This volume lists all ongoing agency activity with a (very brief) abstract of each regulatory proposal, and includes citations to the Federal Register for proposals that have already appeared. You can either pick an agency that does things that interest you, or consult the index.
c. You could also just browse through the Federal Register. The Federal Register is also available on line through http://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/. Obviously, this is also an easy way to get a copy of the notice you eventually select.

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”arp2″]

A-Research-Paper.com is committed to deliver a custom paper/essay which is 100% original and deliver it within the deadline. Place your custom order with us and experience the different; You are guaranteed; value for your money and a premium paper which meets your expectations, 24/7 customer support and communication with your writer. Order Now

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Hedda Gabler: Interpretation Custom Essay

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”arp1″]

George Bernard Shaw loved Hedda Gabler. He suggested that the portrayal of Hedda is paradoxically "sympathetically unsympathetic."

In this assignment, write a paper explaining the central paradox of Hedda’s character. Use dialogue and events from the play to support your position.

Write a free-response essay addressing the following:

Hedda Gabler received mixed reviews when it was first staged in 1891. Ibsen’s
realistic drama departed from conventional theater and puzzled his audiences.
George Bernard Shaw praised Ibsen and in a letter to Elizabeth Robbins who
played Hedda, said, "You were sympathetically unsympathetic, which was the
exact solution of the central difficulty of playing Hedda."
In your essay, examine the character of Hedda. How does she arouse both
sympathy and scorn? Using support from the play, explain and justify Shaw’s
observation about Hedda’s character and the difficulty in playing it.
What You Turn In
Your essay should be approximately one to two pages in length. Use one-inch margins
and a 12-point font.
The first paragraph should contain a thesis statement in which you clearly present the
argument you want to make in your essay.
Each body paragraph should begin with a topic sentence in which you clearly state the
argument for that paragraph.
Be sure to support your arguments with brief, relevant examples. Each body paragraph
should include at least three pieces of supporting evidence and should be clearly linked
together with intelligent commentary.
When using direct quotations from the text, document your citation using standard
conventions (for example, use line numbers when quoting poems, act and scene
numbers for drama, and page numbers for fiction).
Hints and Tips
Be sure to prioritize your arguments.

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”arp2″]

A-Research-Paper.com is committed to deliver a custom paper/essay which is 100% original and deliver it within the deadline. Place your custom order with us and experience the different; You are guaranteed; value for your money and a premium paper which meets your expectations, 24/7 customer support and communication with your writer. Order Now

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

On Being An Atheist Custom Essay

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”arp1″]

RESPONSE PAPER INSTRUCTIONS
Having completed the unit of philosophy of religion, you are now ready to respond to an article written by an actual atheist. This article titled “On Being an Atheist,” was written by H. J. McCloskey in 1968 for the journal Question. McCloskey is an Australian philosopher who wrote a number of atheistic works in the 1960s and 70s including the book God and Evil (Nijhoff, 1974). In this article, McCloskey is both critical of the classical arguments for God’s existence and offers the problem of evil as a reason why one should not believe in God. Please note the following parameters for this paper:
1. Your assignment is to read McCloskey’s short article found in the Reading & Study folder in Module/Week 7 and respond to each of the questions below. Your instructor is looking for a detailed response to each question.
2. The response paper is to be a minimum of 1,500 words (not including quotes) and should be written as a single essay and not just a list of answers to questions.
3. The basis for your answers should primarily come from the resources provided in the lessons covering the philosophy of religion unit of the course (Evans and Manis, Craig, and the presentation) and these sources should be mentioned in your paper. You are not merely to quote these sources as an answer to the question—answer them in your own words.
4. You may use other outside sources as well, as long as you properly document them. However, outside sources are not necessary. Each of the questions can be answered from the sources provided in the lessons.
5. While the use of the Bible is not restricted, its use is not necessary and is discouraged unless you intend to explain the context of the passage and how that context applies to the issue at hand in accordance with the guidelines provided earlier in the course. You are not to merely quote scripture passages as answers to the questions. Remember this is a philosophical essay not a biblical or theological essay.
6. While you may quote from sources, all quotations should be properly cited and quotes from sources will not count towards the 1,500 word count of the paper.
7. You may be critical of McCloskey, but should remain respectful. Any disparaging comment(s) about McCloskey will result in a significant reduction in grade.
8. Please note that all papers are to be submitted through SafeAssign, which is a plagiarism detection program. The program is a database of previously submitted papers including copies of papers that have been located on the Internet. Once submitted, your paper will become part of the database as well. The program detects not only exact wording but similar wording. This means that if you plagiarize, it is very likely that it will be discovered. Plagiarism will result in a 0 for the paper and the likelihood of you being dropped from the course.


Specifically, you should address the following questions in your paper:
1. McCloskey refers to the arguments as “proofs” and often implies that they can’t definitively establish the case for God, so therefore they should be abandoned. What would you say about this in light of my comments on the approaches to the arguments in the PointeCast presentation?
2. On the Cosmological Argument:
a. McCloskey claims that the “mere existence of the world constitutes no reason for believing in such a being [i.e., a necessarily existing being].” Using Evans and Manis’ discussion of the non-temporal form of the argument (on pp. 69–77), explain why the cause of the universe must be necessary (and therefore uncaused).
b. McCloskey also claims that the cosmological argument “does not entitle us to postulate an all-powerful, all-perfect, uncaused cause.” In light of Evans and Manis’ final paragraph on the cosmological argument (p. 77), how might you respond to McCloskey?
3. On the Teleological Argument:
a. McCloskey claims that “to get the proof going, genuine indisputable examples of design and purpose are needed.” Discuss this standard of “indisputability” which he calls a “very conclusive objection.” Is it reasonable?
b. From your reading in Evans and Manis, can you offer an example of design that, while not necessarily “indisputable,” you believe provides strong evidence of a designer of the universe?
c. McCloskey implies that evolution has displaced the need for a designer. Assuming evolution is true, for argument’s sake, how would you respond to McCloskey (see Evans and Manis pp. 82–83)?
d. McCloskey claims that the presence of imperfection and evil in the world argues against “the perfection of the divine design or divine purpose in the world.” Remembering Evans and Manis’ comments about the limitations of the cosmological argument, how might you respond to this charge by McCloskey?
4. On the Problem of Evil:
a. McCloskey’s main objection to theism is the presence of evil in the world and he raises it several times: “No being who was perfect could have created a world in which there was unavoidable suffering or in which his creatures would (and in fact could have been created so as not to) engage in morally evil acts, acts which very often result in injury to innocent persons.” The language of this claim seems to imply that it is an example of the logical form of the problem. Given this implication and using Evans and Manis’ discussion of the logical problem (pp. 159–168, noting especially his concluding paragraphs to this section), how might you respond to McCloskey?

b. McCloskey specifically discusses the free will argument, asking “might not God have very easily so have arranged the world and biased man to virtue that men always freely chose what is right?” From what you have already learned about free will in the course, and what Evans and Manis says about the free will theodicy, especially the section on Mackie and Plantinga’s response (pp. 163–166) and what he says about the evidential problem (pp. 168–172), how would you respond to McCloskey’s question?
5. On Atheism as Comforting:
a. In the final pages of McCloskey’s article, he claims that atheism is more comforting than theism. Using the argument presented by William Lane Craig in the article “The Absurdity of Life without God,” (located in Reading & Study for Module/Week 6), respond to McCloskey’s claim.

The Response Paper is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of Module/Week 7.

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”arp2″]

A-Research-Paper.com is committed to deliver a custom paper/essay which is 100% original and deliver it within the deadline. Place your custom order with us and experience the different; You are guaranteed; value for your money and a premium paper which meets your expectations, 24/7 customer support and communication with your writer. Order Now

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Eassy Question and Research Custom Essay

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”arp1″]

Since the development of photography and the moving image the concept of what is real has been questioned and challenged. Select two images and discuss how they represent different concepts and realism. Make it feel real. Don’t need to focus on photography or film you can work around them. Use images to help support what your saying. Focus on one or two pieces of work. Make an argument between picture and text. Research added.

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”arp2″]

A-Research-Paper.com is committed to deliver a custom paper/essay which is 100% original and deliver it within the deadline. Place your custom order with us and experience the different; You are guaranteed; value for your money and a premium paper which meets your expectations, 24/7 customer support and communication with your writer. Order Now

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

eHealth and eHIM Custom Essay

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”arp1″]

What is eHealth?
What new skills will you need for the changes coming to healthcare? How will you develop new skills throughout your career as things change in ways we may not anticipate now? Review the Healthcare paradigm shifts in Table 14-1 on page 447 of your textbook. Are you prepared to adapt?

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”arp2″]

A-Research-Paper.com is committed to deliver a custom paper/essay which is 100% original and deliver it within the deadline. Place your custom order with us and experience the different; You are guaranteed; value for your money and a premium paper which meets your expectations, 24/7 customer support and communication with your writer. Order Now

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

rights of individuals and the power of the state Custom Essay

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”arp1″]

Your essay should make substantial use of the various texts and documents that were assigned readings during the semester.

In an increasingly globalized world, it is possible that the rights of individuals as compared to the powers and control of the state (or national government) may sometimes be in conflict. In your essay, explore the challenges of protecting the rights of individual citizens in an environment when states acquire more authority and exercise of power.
Your essay should deal with three different centuries: 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries. In each historical time period, select two different examples from different parts of the globe (for the 19th and 20th centuries, you must select one of your two examples from a non-Western territory) to illustrate the values of a given people, the political challenges that they faced and what social and economic plans the people developed to build a better life. Did the state enhance the ability of its people to ?modernize??
You do not need to examine the entire century, but rather a slice of history that helps you make an argument about a particular group of people in a specific time and place. But you must have examples for two territories in each of the 3 centuries in order to receive full credit.
In the conclusion to your essay, decide what is most significant about your argument concerning rights of individuals and the power of the state.

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”arp2″]

A-Research-Paper.com is committed to deliver a custom paper/essay which is 100% original and deliver it within the deadline. Place your custom order with us and experience the different; You are guaranteed; value for your money and a premium paper which meets your expectations, 24/7 customer support and communication with your writer. Order Now

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Ethics and Information Technology Custom Essay

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”arp1″]

Find and describe three examples of unethical behavior involving computers or computer-controlled communications. Discuss why these behaviors are unethical and provide recommendations for their correction.

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”arp2″]

A-Research-Paper.com is committed to deliver a custom paper/essay which is 100% original and deliver it within the deadline. Place your custom order with us and experience the different; You are guaranteed; value for your money and a premium paper which meets your expectations, 24/7 customer support and communication with your writer. Order Now

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Critical Legal Thinking Case Custom Essay

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”arp1″]

Respond to the following Factual Scenario. Your responses must be in APA format. A Critical legal Thinking Rubric for preparing your responses to Critical Legal Thinking Case Assignments is posted in COURSE INFORMATION.

Submit your response to me using the appropriate assignment link in Assignments. Be sure to follow the instructions for submitting assignments. They are located in COURSE INFORMATION.

Important Guidelines

1. Your score will be determined by evaluation of your substantive content.Your analysis and solutions as applicable must be based on the principles of law, ethics, or business principles presented in the text and on the course site–not merely on your opinions. You must describe how application of the principles of law to the key facts support your determination of the issues. You need to show the reasoning behind your decision.

2. The length of your response has no bearing on your score. There is no minimum or limit. Most responses will be from two to three substantive pages.

3. Key facts are those facts that determine if the principles of law are met. You do not need to repeat the factual scenario. Doing so does not meet the requirement of recognizing the key facts. You must still demonstrate you recognize those key facts.
Factual Scenario:
Roger is a director of a major car manufacturer. This is one of the few remaining car companies yet to introduce a sport utility vehicle. Roger convinces the board to investigate forming a new division to design, build and market a sport utility vehicle. Roger convinces the board that the first sport utility vehicle that the division introduces should be the largest yet sold to the general public. The board sets up a committee to do some research, and this committee hired a marketing consulting firm. The committee and the consulting firm both had a few reservations about such a large vehicle, but the data showed that the market could most likely support it. After much discussion, the board of directors voted in favor of creating the new division and the huge sport utility vehicle as its first product. The vote was 9 to 6 in favor of the plan. Shortly before this vehicle was introduced, there was a major oil supply disruption that caused the price of crude oil to nearly triple. Few purchasers were found for the huge new sport utility vehicle and the company lost considerable money. A shareholder files suit against Roger claiming he violated his duty to the corporation by convincing the board to build and market the large SUV. Discuss Roger’s duties as a director, and any defenses he has to the lawsuit.

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”arp2″]

A-Research-Paper.com is committed to deliver a custom paper/essay which is 100% original and deliver it within the deadline. Place your custom order with us and experience the different; You are guaranteed; value for your money and a premium paper which meets your expectations, 24/7 customer support and communication with your writer. Order Now

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

live free or die hard movie review Custom Essay

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”arp1″]

this is going to be a movie review about the movie live free or die hard which you may have to watch.

Once you have good information about the movie you must write a movie review about live free or die hard pretend you are a critic writing about the movie

IF NEEDED research the net to read about movie reviews like what did they say and ratings
once you are ready to type the paper
you are going to type the paper as a critic who liked the movie live free or die hard NO SPOILERS add summary include broad pictures( about the movie not real pictures) of the major events use 5 star rating and explain why did you it 5 stars

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”arp2″]

A-Research-Paper.com is committed to deliver a custom paper/essay which is 100% original and deliver it within the deadline. Place your custom order with us and experience the different; You are guaranteed; value for your money and a premium paper which meets your expectations, 24/7 customer support and communication with your writer. Order Now

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]