Bi-cycle model for program

Needs and strengths assessment Hughes & Margetts 2011, Chp 3 ‹Ÿ? ‹Ÿ? ‹Ÿ? (Hughes & margetts 2011; SACHRU Program Planning 1994; Goldberg et al 1999; Wass 2000 Hughes & Margetts 2011, Chp 4 › Analysing structure and attributes of community; understanding community context; social and environmental determinants › Involving community from the ?outset; utilising community capacity (knowledge, connections, leadership); building community capacity A description of the Salisbury community socio-demographic profile of the community, and, historical, geographical and cultural facts about the area, for example, the mix of residential, commercial, industrial and agricultural development Hughes & Margetts 2011, Chp 4 › Embedded within phc › participatory, collaborative, sharing of knowledge and resources › empowerment & action for health improvement › › ? McCashen 2005 › Hughes & Margetts 2011, Chp 5 To answer questions: › What is the problem/issue? › Who does it affect and how many are affected (prevalence) › What are the effects eg. burden of disease, costs? (significance) › What are the Consequences of doing nothing? › Are the issues important to community members? › Is there community support for action? › Are there resources to support addressing the issue? (p54) › epidemiological data, views of experts, current services, community resources, theory › community perceptions of problem/issue, barriers and enablers, interest in participating › The nature of the problem obesity and burden of disease; prevalence of childhood obesity; diet and physical activity patterns of children; high risk sub-groups; obesogenic environment. You should compare national, state and local data, where possible. The purpose is to demonstrate the magnitude and significance of the childhood obesity problem in Salisbury. › › › (Talbot & Verrinder 2005) Similar ideas to Step 1:Community analysis and engagement Understanding stakeholder agendas to build capacity for intervention › determine capacity (interest, influence & resources) › Assess sources of opposition & support › Build partnerships and alliances Hughes & Margetts 2011 Important principles for effective partnerships with stakeholders: › Shared vision and agreed upon values › Shared decision-making management committee, working party, steering group › Consensus on intervention governance deliverable, accountability, reporting, risk management, Terms of reference (p67) › Resources and relationships within the community (a) what services, organisations, structures or programs that can contribute to a nutrition intervention, and (b) stakeholders and potential partners who can contribute to and participate in the intervention who they are; what information you need from them; how you will engage them; and what may be their likely role. Hughes & Margetts 2011, Chp 7 › Analysing individual, social, economic and environmental determinants of problem/issue › Determining causal association › restricting junk food marketing (protective); Increasing access to healthy foods (promoting) › Hazards or risks threat to health eg. cheap pricing of EDNP foods Hughes & Margetts 2011, p 75 › directly impacts problem/issue eg. f&v protective of obesity, diabetes › access, knowledge, attitudes influence f&v consumption › downstream behavioural or biomedical › Socio-environmental upstream Hughes & Margetts 2011, p 75 Hughes & Margetts 2011, Chp 8 › Capacity building approach to working with communities aims for sustainable interventions; Using and developing skills, networks and resources of community › Capacity analysis involves identifying and respecting existing skills, structures, partnerships, resources › Builds trust, engages community, empowers community (p 84) Hughes & Margetts 2011, Chp 9 › drivers and levers for interventions; national, state, organisational policies › Communicate evaluation results of local interventions to policy-makers (to provide evidence for policy development) Hughes & Margetts 2011, Chp10 › in similar situations strategy mix, and evaluation › Avoid re-inventing the wheel! › Strategy mix refer to Ottawa Charter framework (WHO 1986) , p116 › changing community norms/attitudes social marketing Go for 2 &5 › changing environments healthy school canteens › changing knowledge, skills, beliefs individual or group education p115 Hughes & Margetts 2011, Chp 11 › Assess risks associated with doing nothing And risks associated with intervention strategies › Strategy prioritisation is always a compromise between ideal strategy mix and available (limited) resources, capacity & mandate for action ?best buys(eg. ACE Obesity: assessing cost effectiveness of obesity interventions in children and adolescents 2006) › Clear, concise presentation of information gained to all people who contributed, stakeholders and decision-makers › Maintain community/stakeholder engagement › The format needs to be appropriate (eg. ?report format for the organisation, ?newsletter or ?letter format with key issues identified for community members, presentation at public meeting etc › Literature review of Australian data highlighting the barriers to fruit and vegetable consumption; Audit of local businesses selling fresh fruit and vegetables in the OPAL catchment area; Development of localised survey tool (including quality audit, how we can support promotion of f&v, what they need support with, education re storage › › › The Intelligence phase is crucial to successful program development planning the right intervention › All steps in the cycle describe a comprehensive approach to Intelligence gathering › Community engagement and building capacity yield benefits in intervention development, health impacts and sustainability › It is important to distinguish between deficit and strengths-based orientations › Hughes R & Margetts BM, 2011, Practical Public Health Nutrition, Wiley-Blackwell › Owen JM, 2006, Program evaluation. Forms and approaches, 3rd edition, Allen & Unwin › Green L & Kreuter M (eds), 1991, Health promotion planning: an educational and environmental approach, Mayfield, Mountain View. › Talbot L & Verrinder G. 2005. 3rd Edition. Elsevier. Sydney. › DHS Vic, 2006, ACE Obesity: assessing cost effectiveness of obesity interventions in children and adolescents, Victorian government Department of Human Services › Hawe, P., Degeling, D. & Hall, J. 1990, MacLennan and Petty, Sydney. › McCashen W, 2005, A philosophy for practice, Chp 1 St Lukes Innovative Resources. › Vic Health. 2004. › Hawe P, King L, Noort M, Jordens C, Lloyd B. 1997. , NSW Health Department. www.health.nsw.gov.au › Centre for Primary Health Care, University of QLD. 2002. ÿ

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]
CategoriesUncategorized