[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”arp1″]
Marla and John are parents and they are looking at the immunizations programs. They have both talked with friends at work and have gotten personal stories from their friends. Some of their friends have decided to not vaccinate their children and others have made the decision to vaccinate. There have been a lot of stories in the news about this controversy which is making it all more confusing. They are reading about HPV vaccine programs and the more established ones for Pertussis, DTaP, Hib, Hepatitis B, MMR, Polio and Vericella….but the general question that they have is “should we or shouldn’t we”?
After talking to their friends, they wonder if they should vaccinate their children and John suggests that they research the topic instead of just listening to friends who have no medical background. They are not sure about where to get information about what is needed and why. They are also concerned about the danger of getting any diseases and the dangers of having the vaccines.
Find articles from at least two different sources that your team feels would give them a balanced view – so typically one that is pro and one that is con. Cite your sources. The key question to cover in detail is the following: Tell why you see these as credible sources.
1. Find one article for the pro position. Summarize it.
2. Find one article for the con position. Summarize it.
3. State why EACH article is credible (come up with specific reasons and not just “they seem credible” or “they came from a book so they must be true”). Use the following “checklist” (or another such as CARS) to evaluate your source. List each item below and state how your articles rated on each.
Use the following to guide your discussion of “credibility” of your source. To determine credibility, you must “confirm the veracity” of your own research. Specifically, you must evaluate your source materials to make sure the evidence you use is relevant, sound, valid, and objective. Before you decide to use a source, examine the following issues:
Bias: Can bias, or a slanted point of view, be found in the author, the periodical, or the publisher? Look for objective sources. It is fine for the source to have a point of view but confirm that the point of view expressed in the source is supported by facts, not emotions or opinions.
Competence: Make sure the person you are quoting or paraphrasing has expertise in the subject matter and is qualified to comment on the topic.
Credibility: Examine the content of the evidence for logic and believability. Ask yourself if the evidence and its source earn your trust?
Completeness: Use enough of the evidence to present a clear and complete picture. Don’t take information out of context or mislead the audience by using only the portion that supports your point of view.
Recency: Make sure your evidence is as current as possible and has not been replaced by more recent research findings.
Relevance: Your evidence must relate to the topic you are exploring. Do not use the evidence just because you find it interesting.
Fallacies: Even with accurate facts it is possible for a researcher to make errors in reasoning when analyzing or interpreting those facts.
Place your order of custom research paper With us NOW. The assignment will be written from scratch by our qualified and experienced writers.
[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”arp2″]
A-Research-Paper.com is committed to deliver a custom paper/essay which is 100% original and deliver it within the deadline. Place your custom order with us and experience the different; You are guaranteed; value for your money and a premium paper which meets your expectations, 24/7 customer support and communication with your writer. Order Now
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]
